As I listened to the always incomprehensible Bill Rhoden of The New York Times try to defend Barry Bonds on The Sports Reporters a few Sunday mornings ago, I realized that most of the people who jumped on the “Bonds is the greatest player ever” bandwagon when he started this preposterous home run barrage now feel obligated to defend the indefensible rather than admit their own fallacy, even if that means being attached to Bonds’ dishonor.
If you actually believe Bonds’ assertion that he had no idea he was taking steroids, please contact me immediately – I have some wonderful beachfront property in Kansas I’d like to sell you. Afterwards, please head directly to the appropriate medical professional who can ensure your future sterilization and removal from the gene pool.
I am simply incredulous at the number of people I hear either rationalizing or shrugging their shoulders at the steroid use of Bonds, Giambi, Sheffield, et al. Statements like “it doesn’t help them hit a baseball any better” are so stupid it makes my brain want to cave in on itself. These are professional hitters; if it didn’t help them, they wouldn’t use it. And this isn’t about steroids helping them turn a 400-ft. home run into a 460-ft. home run; it’s about helping them turn a routine fly ball into a 335-ft. home run.
Which brings us directly to the most important aspect of this scandal: the numbers. Baseball is the only game where the stats actually mean something. They define greatness across generations of former players because, even though they may have played in different eras against slightly different talent and varying circumstances, for the most part the game is the same and they were all equipped with the same basic physiology.
Then along comes this group of charlatans, mashing baseballs off already inferior pitching and dwarfing the accomplishments of all who came before them: Aaron, Ruth, Mays, Robinson, Williams – the list goes on and on. (I wonder how Mays really feels about his godson passing him on the home run list now.)
Because of Bonds and his ilk, future generations of fans may have no perspective on how great a player someone like Henry Aaron was, averaging 35 home runs a year for 20 straight seasons. Instead, Bonds’ final numbers may make Aaron’s accomplishments look pale by comparison (Bonds hit 73 in one season, while Aaron topped out at 47), which is why a marker must be attached to those statistics indicating the fraudulency of their nature.
But that won’t happen, not with Major League Baseball in a prime position to finally gain some huge concessions from the almighty players’ union in terms of a strong drug testing policy. Hopefully, some real progress will be made there and over the next few years, league-wide statistics will return to reality.
And hopefully, the numbers of Bonds and his partners in crime will carry their own asterisks of shame down through the generations. Because these thieves, who had their physical abilities augmented in a laboratory, shouldn’t be allowed to steal the records of those who came before them and played the game with the natural gifts God gave them.